LinkedIn Carousel Engagement Statistics

According to Social Insider, LinkedIn carousels dominate performance in 2025, achieving average engagement rates of 24.42%—a 3.7x multiplier versus text-only posts. Carousels generate 278% more engagement than videos, 303% more than image posts, and 596% more than text-only posts. Users spend 15-20 seconds on carousels versus 8-10 seconds for single-image or text posts. This article presents detailed LinkedIn carousel engagement statistics, their performance vs other formats, and best practices for optimization.

What Is LinkedIn Carousel Performance?

Carousel Engagement Rate

According to Social Insider [1], LinkedIn carousels dominate performance in 2025, achieving average engagement rates of 24.42%—a 3.7x multiplier versus text-only posts. [1] Carousel performance:

• Average engagement rate: 24.42% [1]
• Multiplier vs text: 3.7x [1]
• Multiplier vs video: 278% more engagement [3]
• Multiplier vs image: 303% more engagement [3]
• Multiplier vs text: 596% more engagement [3]

Carousel Dominance Mechanics

Carousel slides require swiping, which counts as engagement in LinkedIn's algorithm. This extended interaction signals interest to the platform, triggering broader distribution. [2] Carousel success factors:

• Extended interaction: Swiping counts as engagement
• High dwell time: 15-20 seconds vs 8-10 seconds for other formats
• Digestible format: Breaks down complex information
• Extended distribution: Algorithm favors extended interactions

What Are the Detailed Carousel Engagement Statistics?

Comparison with Other Formats

Carousels generate significantly more engagement than all other LinkedIn content formats. [3] Engagement multipliers:

• vs Videos: 278% more engagement [3]
• vs Image posts: 303% more engagement [3]
• vs Text-only posts: 596% more engagement [3]

Carousel Dwell Time

Users spend 15-20 seconds on carousels versus 8-10 seconds for single-image or text posts. [4] Dwell time impact:

• High dwell time: Signals content quality to algorithm
• Extended distribution: Favors distribution beyond immediate network
• Quality engagement: Indicates real interest rather than quick scroll

Best Practices for Carousels

Optimal Structure

Optimal carousel structure follows the "cover slide + numbered list" formula, with bold formatting and clear narrative arcs. [5] Key elements:

• Cover slide: Visual hook, clear title
• Numbered list: Clear structure (e.g., "5 ways to...")
• Bold formatting: Highlights key points
• Clear narrative arcs: Logical content progression

Numbered frameworks: Carousels with numbered frameworks (e.g., "5 ways to...") achieve 20-30% more dwell time than loosely structured slides. [5]

Content Optimization

Strategies to optimize carousels:

• Numbered frameworks: Use structures like "5 ways to...", "10 tips for..."
• Bold formatting: Highlight key points
• Spacing: Use white space for readability
• Narrative progression: Create clear narrative arc
• Digestible content: Break down complex information

Numbered framework impact:

• +20-30% dwell time vs loosely structured slides [5]
• Better retention: Clear structure facilitates understanding
• Extended engagement: Encourages complete swiping

Document Performance

Document posts (PDFs uploaded directly) perform similarly to carousels, generating 2.5x more shares, 27% higher completion rates, and 14% greater reach among decision-makers compared to video or image posts. [6] Document advantages:

• High shares: 2.5x more shares [6]
• Completion rate: 27% higher [6]
• Decision-maker reach: 14% greater among decision-makers [6]
• Evergreen content: Ideal for checklists, templates, research

Recommended usage:

• Evergreen content: Checklists, templates, research findings
• Long-term reference: Content users save
• Decision-makers: Content targeting decision-makers

Comparison with Other Formats

Format Hierarchy by Engagement

Carousels dominate the format hierarchy by engagement, with a significant gap with other formats. [7] Complete hierarchy:

1. Carousels/Documents: 24.42% (best format)
2. Multi-images: 6.60%
3. Videos: 6.47%
4. Images: 6.05%
5. Polls: 4.40%
6. Text-only: 4.10%

Performance gap:

• Carousels vs Multi-images: 3.7x more engagement
• Carousels vs Videos: 3.8x more engagement
• Carousels vs Text: 6x more engagement

Optimization Strategies

Creating High-Performing Carousels

Checklist for high-performing carousels:

• Engaging cover slide with clear title
• Numbered framework (e.g., "5 ways to...")
• Bold formatting for key points
• Optimal spacing and readability
• Clear narrative arc and logical progression
• Digestible and actionable content

High-Performing Structure Examples

"5 ways to..." structure:

• Slide 1: Cover with title "5 ways to..."
• Slides 2-6: Each way with key point in bold
• Slide 7: Conclusion and CTA

"10 tips for..." structure:

• Slide 1: Cover with title "10 tips for..."
• Slides 2-11: Each tip with bold formatting
• Slide 12: Summary and action

Format Rotation

Format rotation (carousel, text, video, polls) generates 37% more follower growth and 28% more consistent visibility. [7] Recommended rotation strategy:

• Carousels: 30-40% of content (dominant format)
• Videos: 20-30% of content
• Images/Multi-images: 20-30% of content
• Text/Polls: 10-20% of content

Glossary

LinkedIn Carousel : Content format composed of multiple slides that users swipe, generating high engagement through extended interaction. Numbered Framework : Carousel structure using numbered lists (e.g., "5 ways to...", "10 tips for..."), generating 20-30% more dwell time. Dwell Time : Duration users spend reading or engaging with a post. Carousels generate 15-20 seconds vs 8-10 seconds for other formats. Document Post : Content format using PDFs uploaded directly, performing similarly to carousels with 2.5x more shares.

Methodology

The data presented in this article comes from:

• Primary sources: Official LinkedIn reports, internal LinkedIn analyses, company case studies
• Secondary sources: Analytics tool analyses, creator case studies, company reports
• Period covered: Data primarily from 2024-2025
• Limitations: Metrics may vary by industry, company size, and objectives. Benchmarks may differ by region.

FAQ