LinkedIn Post Templates Library

5 mistakes killing your LinkedIn credibility: 1. Blurry or too casual profile photo ↳ You have 3 seconds to make a good impression 2. Generic headline ("Entrepreneur") ↳ Say what you DO, not what you ARE 3. About section filled with buzzwords ↳ "Passionate, innovative, creative" = 0 differentiation 4. Accepting all invitations indiscriminately ↳ Your network = your professional capital 5. Posting without strategy or consistency ↳ The algorithm rewards consistency Which mistake have you made?

87% of LinkedIn posts get less than 10 interactions. Here are 4 techniques top creators use (but never share): → The 3-word max hook Attention on LinkedIn < 1.3 seconds. Start STRONG. → The strategic white line A space every 2-3 lines = +47% complete read. → The invisible CTA Ask a closed question (yes/no) rather than open. → The morning + evening repost Your audience doesn't connect all at the same time. Virality isn't luck. It's method. Which one are you already applying?

6 months ago, my LinkedIn posts had 12 views on average. Today, I regularly exceed 10,000 views. Here are the 4 exact steps I followed: Step 1: I stopped "sharing thoughts" → Nobody wants to read your morning musings. Provide VALUE. Step 2: I created a daily note-taking system → Every conversation = 3 post ideas minimum. Step 3: I posted 5 days/week for 90 days → The algorithm rewards consistency, not occasional genius. Step 4: I analyzed my 20 best posts → Patterns = short hooks + white lines + final question. LinkedIn growth isn't mysterious. It's systematic. Which step will you apply first?

2019. My first product launch. I spent 6 months building the "perfect solution". Zero tested clients. Zero real feedback. Just my assumptions. Launch: 3 sales. €11,000 invested. Product abandoned 2 months later. That day, I understood: the market doesn't care about your vision. It wants to solve ITS problems, not admire YOUR solution. Now, I sell BEFORE building. → 50 client conversations → Pre-sales to validate → MVP in 3 weeks max My last launch: 43 clients in 10 days. Same budget. The difference? I built what the market WANTED, not what I THOUGHT it wanted. Have you experienced this?

6:30 AM — Wake up. Coffee. Inbox: 47 unread messages. 7:00 AM — Unhappy client. The deliverable doesn't match his expectations (even though we validated together). 9:00 AM — Emergency call. We redo everything. I postpone 3 other projects. 2:00 PM — New brief validated. Starting from scratch. 6:30 PM — Final delivery. Delighted client. "Exactly what I wanted!". What nobody sees behind a "successful project": → 2 short nights → 1 sacrificed weekend → 4h of unbilled meetings → 0 public thanks Instagram entrepreneurship vs real life. Success is 10% strategy and 90% ability to endure. What's YOUR reality?

Yesterday's conversation with a potential client: Him: "Your offer is 3× more expensive than your competitors. Why?" Me: "Because we're not selling the same thing." Him: "Really? It's the same deliverable though." Me: "They sell you 10h of work. I sell you 10 years of avoided mistakes." [Silence] This conversation sums up everything wrong with the race to the bottom. You don't sell TIME. You sell TRANSFORMATION. A junior can spend 40h on a project. An expert does the same in 4h... and it's 10× more effective. The difference? Expertise. Do you sell time or value?

How to write a viral LinkedIn post in 15 minutes: 1️⃣ Start with the end Write your CTA (final question) first. It clarifies your goal. 2️⃣ Find your hook in 3 words max "Yesterday, I..." "Nobody..." "In 2019..." Attention < 1.3 seconds on LinkedIn. 3️⃣ Structure in 2-3 line blocks A white line every 2-3 lines = +47% complete read. 4️⃣ Add bullets or numbered emojis It makes the post scannable. People read diagonally. 5️⃣ Read out loud If it sounds complicated orally, simplify. Fatal mistake: writing like a blog post. LinkedIn = conversation, not essay. Who's testing today?

I use the V.I.P. framework for my LinkedIn posts. +12K subscribers in 8 months. 80% of my posts > 5K views. Here's how it works: ✦ V = Vulnerability Share your failures, not just successes. → Example: "I lost €15K on this launch" performs 4× better than "I made €30K". ✦ I = Actionable Insight No theoretical blabla. A concrete action. → Example: "Post 5 days/week" > "Be consistent". ✦ P = Measured Provocation Challenge a common belief (with respect). → Example: "Networking is overrated" generates +230% comments. Result: → Engagement × 3 → Organic shares × 5 → DM conversations × 7 Which pillar are you missing most?

BEFORE (my LinkedIn posts in January 2024): → 200 views on average → 5 likes → 0 comment → 0 conversion AFTER (my posts in February 2025): → 8,500 views on average → 180+ interactions → 15-20 comments per post → 12 direct clients/month What changed: 1. I stopped talking about ME → 80% of my posts = solving ONE precise problem for my audience. 2. I split my posts into micro-chunks → White line every 2-3 lines. Zero walls of text. 3. I posted at the same times (8am & 6pm) → The algorithm rewards consistency. Result: ×42 visibility. ×36 engagement. ×12 clients. Do you want the same result?

Do you really need to post every day on LinkedIn? Everyone says "yes, consistency is key". But nobody talks about this: → 90% of creators posting 7 days/week see engagement plummet after 3 months. → Top LinkedIn creators post 3-4×/week MAX. → Gary Vee himself says: "Document, don't create" ≠ "Spam your audience". The real question: does EVERY post bring value? One mediocre daily post < 3 excellent posts per week. The algorithm rewards ENGAGEMENT, not FREQUENCY. Which strategy do you prefer: quantity or quality?

Situation: You have 2h/day to develop your LinkedIn presence. Option A: Create original content → You build your Personal Brand → But the algorithm takes 6-12 months to take off Option B: Comment under big accounts → You're visible immediately → But you remain "the audience" of another Most people choose A and quit after 3 months. Me? I do 70% option B + 30% option A for 6 months. Then I reverse. Result: 3× faster growth + solid network. And you, what do you choose?

Everyone optimizes their LinkedIn profile. But is it really your #1 priority? Here's why it's overrated: → A perfect profile without content = 0 visibility → LinkedIn doesn't promote profiles, it promotes POSTS → 95% of your visitors come from a viral post, not a search The alternative: Spend 10% of your time on your profile. 90% on content creation. One post that hits > 6 months of SEO optimization. My profile was "average" for 8 months. I still gained 9K subscribers thanks to my posts. Do you agree or not at all?

87% of LinkedIn posts get less than 10 interactions. In other words: if your post exceeds 10 likes, you're already in the top 13%. Why is this number so low? → 70% of LinkedIn users NEVER post → Among those who post, 80% quit after 5 posts → The algorithm favors the 3% of consistent creators What it means for you: You DON'T need to be excellent. You just need to be CONSISTENT. 3 average posts/week for 90 days > 1 "perfect" post per month. The algorithm rewards consistency, not genius. Did you know that?

LinkedIn posts with emojis: 17% more engagement. LinkedIn posts with white line every 2-3 lines: +47% complete read. The difference is mind-blowing. Why does it work? The brain processes information visually BEFORE text. A compact post = wall of text = instant scroll. An airy post = feeling of ease = reading. What it reveals: → The form (visual structure) matters more than the substance (your message) → People read diagonally, not line by line → A good LinkedIn post looks like a Twitter thread, not an article Concrete action: Before publishing, scroll your post in 2 seconds. If it looks like a wall, add spaces. Does it change your view?

In 2020, LinkedIn = recruitment platform. In 2025, LinkedIn = content platform. +340% active creators in 5 years. What changed: → The algorithm now favors native posts > external links → Carousels perform 3× better than links → "Influential" profiles exceed company pages in reach What it means for you: 1. Your resume on LinkedIn is no longer enough → Without content, you're invisible. 2. Opportunities come from posts, not applications → 73% of recruiters check your LinkedIn activity before contacting you. 3. Personal Branding beats SEO → A viral post brings you + leads than a website. Stop optimizing your profile. Start creating content. Did you see it coming?

The problem: You've been posting on LinkedIn for 3 months. Result: 50 views per post, 3 likes, 0 comments. If you don't change anything, the algorithm will bury you forever. The solution in 3 steps: 1. Stop talking about yourself → Nobody connects on LinkedIn to read your diary. Talk about YOUR AUDIENCE's problems. 2. Structure your posts visually → White line every 2-3 lines. Bullets, emojis, numbers. Makes the post scannable in 3 seconds. 3. ALWAYS finish with a question → The algorithm boosts posts with comments. A question = +65% chance of engagement. Expected result: Engagement ×3 from week 2. Who's applying today?

Symptom: You spend 2h writing a LinkedIn post. Result: 30 views, 2 likes. You wonder if "LinkedIn still works". Diagnosis: Your problem isn't LinkedIn. It's your post structure. Common mistake: writing like a blog post. → Long paragraphs → Too slow intro → No visual virality Remedy: ✓ Hook in 1 line (max 8 words) ✓ Blocks of 2-3 lines MAX ✓ Final question for engagement Apply this on your next post. Result after 1 week: → Views ×4 minimum → Engagement ×3 → Algorithm finally boosting you Do you recognize the symptoms?

You think your problem is "I don't have enough followers". But in reality, it's "I don't convert my audience". I've seen accounts with 500 followers generate €10K/month. And accounts with 50K followers make €0. The difference? Engagement. What most people do: → Chase followers → Post without strategy → Ignore comments What to do instead: → Reply to EVERY comment within 2h → Create content that SOLVES a precise problem → Build 1-to-1 relationship in DM Result: 500 true fans > 50,000 passive spectators. Changes everything, doesn't it?

I ignored comments on my posts for 6 months. Result: dead algorithm, engagement divided by 4, 0 conversion. What I should have done: → Reply within 2h (algorithm boosts posts with early interactions) → Create real conversations, not just "thanks" → Use comments to identify my next posts What I learned: LinkedIn isn't a blog. It's a SOCIAL network. If you don't socialize (= comments), the algorithm punishes you. 1 post + 10 comment replies > 2 posts without interaction. Don't make the same mistake.

It took me 2 years to understand this: People don't follow your journey. They follow your TRANSFORMATION. Nobody wants to read "Today I launched X". Everyone wants to read "Here's how I went from Y to Z". Concrete example: Before: "I'm launching my LinkedIn training" → 12 likes After: "6 months ago, 0 clients. Today, €40K/month. Here's how" → 340 likes, 28 comments, 15 shares The difference? The TRANSFORMATION. Result: +520% engagement. I wish I knew it earlier. You know it now.

3 lessons learned after 18 months of LinkedIn content creation: 1. Consistency beats talent → I've seen "average" posts explode just because the creator posted 4×/week. The algorithm rewards consistency, not occasional genius. 2. One comment is worth 10 likes → The algorithm boosts posts with conversations. 1 post + 15 comments > 3 posts with 50 likes each. 3. Your "worst" posts reveal your true voice → "Imperfect" posts (vulnerable, cash, spontaneous) perform 3× better than "polished" posts. What it changes today: I no longer seek perfection. I seek connection. Which lesson resonates most?

Unpopular opinion: Networking is overrated. "But everyone says networking is 80% of success!" Here's why it's wrong: → I have 12K LinkedIn contacts. 95% never brought me a single opportunity. → My 3 best clients come from viral posts, not DM networking. → Spending 5h at networking events < publishing 1 viral post reaching 50K people. The truth: Content beats contact. 1 post that resonates > 100 networking coffees. Your network grows AUTOMATICALLY when your content brings value. Agree or disagree?

Myth: You must post every day on LinkedIn. Reality: Frequency kills more accounts than it grows. The proof: → Internal LinkedIn study: 3-4 posts/week = optimal engagement rate → Top creators (50K+ subscribers) post on average 3.2×/week → Posting daily without value = algorithm penalizes you Why does this myth persist? Because people confuse activity and results. What to do instead: → 3 excellent posts/week > 7 average posts → Spend 70% of time on engagement (comments), 30% on creation Who dares to question it?

Nobody will tell you, so I will: Your LinkedIn content isn't invisible because "the algorithm is broken". It's invisible because it's boring. Hard to hear? Yes. True? Absolutely. Concrete examples: → You talk about YOU instead of solving YOUR AUDIENCE's problems → Your posts look like blog posts (= instant scroll) → You don't engage (= algorithm ignores you) The good news: It's fixable. 1. Stop the "me me me" → speak to your audience 2. Visual structure: white line every 2-3 lines 3. Comment on 10 posts/day before publishing yours It stings, but it's true. Are you ready to accept it?